You might also be interested in this

Artikel
Artikel
Obelix vs. Obelix: When a Famous Comic Character Goes to War at the General Court
by
Cathérine Elkemann

The EUIPO saw no problem with OBELIX on goods such as firearms and explosives. Les Éditions Albert René did. In its judgment of 13 May 2026 in Case T-24/25, the General Court sided with the publisher — finding EUIPO's assessment of both reputation and the required link between the marks to be fundamentally flawed.

Artikel
Artikel
IP Notices: The Communication Pitfalls Behind ®, ™ and Ⓓ
by
Leonhard Sonner

Symbols such as “®” and indications such as “patented” are widely recognised. They are encountered almost daily, for example on product packaging in shops. Known more precisely as “IP notices”, such symbols have become a standard feature of commercial practice in Germany. However, they are often misunderstood.

Artikel
Artikel
Three-dimensional shape trademarks in practice: Stuttgart Regional Court rejects claim that the packaging of a square oat bar infringes the square “Ritter SPORT” shape trademark
by
Joel Grunau

Following legal disputes relating to the origin of chocolate bars another feature of chocolate bars is causing a stir these days: their shape.

Artikel
Artikel
Ten seconds aren’t enough: Bamberg Regional Court orders YouTube to permanently label sponsored content in influencer videos
by
Michael Wittlinger

We summarize the Bamberg Regional Court’s decision dated March 11, 2026 (case no. 1 HK O 19/25) for you and explain its implications for platform operators and influencers.