Act against Digital Violence
The purpose of the law is to enable victims of rights violations in the digital space to enforce their rights more effectively. The key points of the draft are:
Right to information: Data subjects whose personal rights have been violated by certain criminal content shall have easier access to information about the identity of the users acting unlawfully. Online platforms and hosting services are obliged to provide this information.
Storage and blocking: An early court order for the storage of relevant data by service providers is intended to prevent such data from being deleted before the proceedings are concluded. In addition, a new instrument is introduced that allows for the blocking of user accounts by court order to prevent or stop serious infringements.
Authorized recipients: Social networks that are not based in an EU member state must continue to appoint a domestic authorized recipient. Providers from other EU member states may be required to appoint an authorized recipient for legal proceedings in individual cases.
Scope of criminal offenses: The law against digital violence covers, among other things, punishable hate speech, deep fakes and doxing. This broadening of the scope of criminal offenses is intended to ensure that a wide range of forms of digital violence are covered and prosecuted.
Proportionality: Court-ordered measures, such as account suspensions, must be proportionate and will only be ordered for a reasonable period of time.
Final remark: The law aims to strengthen victims' rights by providing more effective legal tools and options, without fundamentally questioning the fundamental principles of freedom of expression and anonymity on the internet. It remains to be seen how the draft will be handled after the federal elections.
You might also be interested in this
Anyone who has to justify internally why money is spent on protecting trademarks, patents, designs and other intellectual property rights should refer to the recently published joint study by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) entitled “Intellectual Property Rights and Firm Performance in the European Union”.
The new European Design Regulation (“EUDR”) (the Amending Regulation on Community designs no. 2024/2822) will be applicable as of 1 May 2025. The reform not only introduces new terminology but will also change renewal periods and fees and introduce a new grace period for late renewals.
In mid-November, we reported that GEMA was seemingly going on the offensive against the providers of generative AI systems with its lawsuit against OpenAI before the Munich Regional Court . The lawsuit accuses OpenAI of training its well-known product “ChatGPT” with copyrighted song lyrics, which are also part of the repertoire of GEMA members. Now comes another lawsuit: On 21 January 2025, GEMA filed a lawsuit against the AI company Suno, again at the Munich Regional Court. We summarise for you what is already known about the proceedings and what the legal issues will be.
The hype surrounding the trendy chocolate is taking on more and more bizarre forms. Customs recently confiscated 90 kg of "Dubai chocolate" from a woman at Hamburg airport. The woman had tried to smuggle in 460 bars of the popular confectionary from Istanbul, apparently aiming at selling them on the German market for a profit. But wait a minute, "Dubai chocolate" from Turkey? Is that even possible?
